TL;DR
Get the little things that make your day delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Marc and Angel Hack Life published an Oct. 25, 2026, article offering ten calming “notes to self” for moments when people feel personally hurt or provoked. The article recommends pausing, reading a chosen reminder and taking a breath, while stressing that not taking things personally does not require accepting disrespect.
Marc and Angel Hack Life published an advice article on Oct. 25 offering ten calming reminders for people who feel hurt or provoked and begin taking a situation personally. The authors pair the reminders with a practical suggestion: pause, read a saved note and take a deep breath before deciding how to respond.
The article’s central point is that people often interpret events through a self-focused lens, treating another person’s anger, silence or disappointment as a judgment of their own worth. Marc and Angel say that reaction can intensify hurt and self-doubt, even when the other person’s behavior reflects circumstances or personal difficulties unrelated to the reader.
The authors recommend a short pause rather than an automatic response. They suggest readers select a few reminders, adapt their wording if useful, and keep them somewhere accessible, such as on a phone. When emotions rise, reading one or two and breathing can help create space to choose whether to answer, redirect a conversation or leave it alone.
The article also draws a distinction between not personalizing someone’s conduct and excusing it. Marc and Angel say readers can recognize that another person may be acting from their own problems while still setting boundaries. For ongoing hostility, they suggest steering a conversation toward a different subject, disagreeing when needed and communicating calmly.
A Pause Before Reacting
The advice addresses a familiar interpersonal problem: a sharp remark or ignored message can feel like a verdict on the person receiving it. The authors’ approach offers a simple, repeatable pause that may help readers avoid escalating a conflict or making a quick assumption about what another person meant. The article presents this as a daily practice, not a guaranteed fix.
Its boundary-setting point matters because advice to “not take things personally” can be misunderstood as a reason to tolerate mistreatment. Marc and Angel explicitly allow for direct responses and limits. A reader can consider other explanations for someone’s behavior without deciding that rude or disrespectful conduct is acceptable.
Popular right now
Samsung 42-Inch Class OLED S90F 4K Smart TV (2025)
Ninja Luxe Café Mini Plus Espresso and Drip Coffee Machine with AutoFroth, Stainless Steel, ES351
Ninja CREAMi 7-in-1 Ice Cream Maker, NC301
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Marc and Angel say their view draws on 16 years of work with coaching clients and live-event attendees. They describe self-centering—seeing events mainly through how they relate to oneself—as a common reason people take remarks and setbacks personally. This is the authors’ account of their experience, not a reported research finding.
The article uses everyday examples, including someone entering a room in a bad mood or reacting rudely after a small annoyance. In either case, it argues, the behavior may be shaped by more than the immediate interaction. The authors do not say that every slight is unrelated to the recipient; rather, they encourage readers to avoid treating another person’s reaction as a complete measure of their own value.
““NOT taking things personally is a daily practice.””
— Marc and Angel Hack Life
Limits of the Advice
The source article is advice based on the authors’ stated coaching experience; it does not provide research evidence establishing how well the reminders work for different people. It also does not include the text of the ten numbered quotes in the supplied source material: the list appears only as numbers one through ten. The specific wording of those ten items therefore cannot be independently summarized here.
The article does not set out a full framework for deciding when a conflict calls for a calm reply, a firmer boundary or outside support. Its examples are general, and the appropriate response will depend on the circumstances, including whether the conduct is repeated or threatening.
Putting a Reminder to Use
Marc and Angel recommend choosing a few reminders, adapting them and saving them where they can be read during a tense moment. The next step in their approach is to pause, breathe and decide whether to respond, redirect the discussion or disengage. They also encourage calm communication and boundaries when a direct conversation is necessary.
The article does not announce a follow-up study or further reporting. Readers looking for the complete ten-item list can consult the original Marc and Angel Hack Life article; the supplied source text does not reproduce the individual entries.
Key Questions
What did Marc and Angel publish?
They published an Oct. 25, 2026, advice article about using calming reminders when people feel personally hurt or provoked.
What do the authors suggest doing in a heated moment?
They suggest pausing, reading one or two saved reminders and taking a deep breath before choosing how to respond.
Does the advice mean accepting disrespect?
No. The authors distinguish between not interpreting conduct as a personal judgment and allowing it to continue. They say readers can set boundaries and address offensive behavior directly.
Are the ten individual quotes included in the available source text?
No. The supplied text shows numbered placeholders from one to ten but does not provide the wording of the individual reminders.
Source: marcandangel.com
